1440 Nabs a $101 Million Valuation As Its Newsletter Playbook Pays Off

Cannes Lions is where the biggest ideas take center stage. Join ADWEEK for must-see conversations, top industry leaders, and the moments everyone will be talking about.

This story was originally published in On Background with Mark Stenberg, a free, weekly newsletter that explores the key themes shaping the media industry. You can sign up for it here.

The independent media brand 1440 has received a third-party valuation of $101 million, according to its chief executive Tim Huelskamp, a figure that reflects both its unusual financial discipline and its ambitions beyond the inbox.

The valuation was conducted earlier this year by a large investment bank using a multiple of four times revenue on approximately $27 million in annual revenue, which it generates with just 27 employees.

Companies are typically assigned a valuation based on a multiple of either their revenue or their earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. Companies with business models considered to be more durable, lucrative, or otherwise attractive receive higher multiples and more favorable terms. 

While companies often receive updated valuations after fundraising rounds, 1440 has never raised outside capital and is not looking to sell, according to Huelskamp. Instead, the reasons for the audit are more practical: Everyone at the company holds equity, and the IRS requires a fair, third-party valuation for options and share-pricing purposes. It is currently distributing dividends to employees and founders.

The valuation catapults 1440 into slightly more rarefied air. According to comparisons shared by the company, Morning Brew was acquired at a valuation of 3.8 times revenue, Axios at 6 times revenue, and Industry Dive at 6.5 times revenue. On the higher end, The Free Press went for 7.5 times revenue and The Athletic for 8.5 times. 

These points of comparison are directionally helpful, but inexact. Morning Brew and The Athletic were both purchased during the heady days of the pandemic, while The Free Press benefited from a highly differentiated founder and editorial identity. Industry Dive caters to a strictly professional audience, while 1440 attracts a general readership. 

As such, its valuation is best understood as reflective of the future value of the company, more so than its current book price, according to Robert Berstein, a managing director at JEGI Leonis, an investment bank that advises on media M&A.

“The valuation that they have today reflects more than what they are,” Berstein said. “If you’re purely a newsletter business, that is a pretty aggressive view.”

FOR Scoops, Sharp Analysis, and Insider Context

By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy . You may opt-out anytime by clicking ‘unsubscribe’ from the newsletter or from your account.

Subscribe

That forward-looking element reflects the fact that, although it started as a newsletter operation, 1440 has in recent years expanded into a variety of new editorial touchpoints.

In October 2024, it launched a web product called Topics, which now encompasses roughly 600 subject-specific pages.

Its YouTube channel, which launched roughly a year ago, now has 150,000 subscribers, and its podcast has surpassed 500,000 downloads. A forthcoming product, described internally as an “Instagram for curious people,” will debut in the coming months. 

The company is also on the verge of another major milestone. Its flagship newsletter, the Daily Digest, is approaching 5 million free subscribers and plans to surpass the number this summer. It topped 4 million subscribers in October 2024.

“We still think our total addressable market is 100 million Americans who are curious and love learning,” Huelskamp said. “We want to build that profitably and long-term without making the same mistakes that other media companies make.”

In addition to growing its media distribution, 1440 is taking steps to raise its brand awareness. At Cannes Lions this year, 1440 is partnering with Beet.TV, and the publisher has a brand campaign in development with Giant Spoon targeting that will air this fall. 

The $101 million valuation also reflects one side of what is typically, in deal making, a two-sided conversation. Ultimately, something is only worth what someone is willing to pay for it. 

When pricing companies for sale, buyers also look at historical numbers and factor in strategic rationale, such as whether an acquisition prevents a competitor from getting an asset, or whether there are costs to strip out. None of that applies here.

Still, the number is accurate enough to be useful, per Berstein. 

“If you’re looking at EBITDA multiples,” he said, “you might not get to $100 million. But you won’t be wildly off it either.”

What’s in a valuation?

So why determine a price for a company that is not for sale? In media, where a decade of fast scaling and platform dependence ended in collapse, a $101 million valuation is proof that restrained growth can compound into the value its venture-backed peers chased and lost.

Indeed, the past few years have not been kind to digital publishers that once carried far higher valuations. BuzzFeed collapsed, Vice went bankrupt, and Vox Media recently broke itself in two. The venture-backed model of raising aggressively, scaling quickly, and hoping platforms deliver traffic has been largely discredited.

1440 did none of that. It bootstrapped, kept its team small, and applied the rigor of consumer acquisition strategies to a single editorial product. The publisher spends just under $1 million per month on user acquisition and adds between 200,000 and 300,000 new subscribers monthly, with about half sticking around, according to Huelskamp. Roughly a third of its subscribers find it organically. 

Its ad rates run around $100,000 per day for the flagship newsletter, with a majority rebooking.

The discipline extends to how it thinks about product. Rather than launching new editorial verticals, 1440 has used Topics to deepen engagement with existing readers and sell more expensive sponsorship packages. 

Its YouTube strategy follows the same logic: roughly 80% of viewers are net-new to 1440, but the videos are built from the same curatorial work that already powers the newsletter, so the marginal cost of production is low.

“We are always asking: How can we do the work once,” Huelskamp said, “then use it to our advantage multiple times?” 

That ethos of efficiency as strategy is what part of what makes its $1 million in revenue per employee a differentiating metric. That figure, according to Berstein, signals capital efficiency to investors, but it is also straightforward enough to make sense to people in the organization.

Still, key questions remain to be answered. The company is doubling down on generalist, evergreen content at a time in which artificial intelligence makes such a strategy uncertain. It is also determining what kind of events strategy might best suit its content offering, which so far has eluded an easy answer. 

But its financial discipline, engaged readership, and self-governance mean 1440 has more time than most to find solutions to those questions. 

Talking Heds

Axios Eyes AI (EXCLUSIVE): In the spring of 2023, Axios Local hit the brakes. After rapidly expanding its network of city-based news outlets, Axios paused the program to focus on profitability. Now, expansion has resumed, bankrolled in part by a partnership with OpenAI, which has underwritten the cost of launching up to nine new markets by the end of the year. In exchange, OpenAI gets access to Axios data. The resumption of the program coincides with a broader upswing at Axios, which beat its first-half revenue target in May, capping a fourth straight year of double-digit growth. The company, as a whole, is profitable, although Local is still losing money. I have often pegged Axios Local as the most likely candidate for reviving local news, a goal now aided by a suite of new applications of AI. 

Weiss Guys: On Tuesday, following a showdown between CBS News journalist Scott Pelley and the newly hired executive producer of 60 Minutes Nick Bilton, CBS fired Pelley, citing his outburst in a company town hall. The move is another indication that CBS editor in chief Bari Weiss, who hired Bilton, has the full backing of her Paramount leadership. The firing comes just two weeks after Puck reported that Paramount leadership had begun reconsidering its appointment of Weiss, a claim the company subsequently denied. This 60 Minutes dustup seems further proof that David Ellison and Paramount are willing to stand behind their woman, despite—or because of—her tendency to alienate key CBS staff. 

NorCal CaPo: The California Post, the recently launched Western division of the New York Post, expanded print operations to Northern California this week, meaning editions of the conservative tabloid will now be available in San Francisco, among other metro areas. The timing could not be more apt. Silicon Valley, once a liberal haven, has seen the political valence of its technocratic elite swing, en masse, to the right. Further south, a former reality television star is running for mayor of Los Angeles, weaponizing concerns over homelessness with lurid, AI-generated ads. Meanwhile, California governor Gavin Newsom is a likely candidate for the 2028 presidential election, all of which have put the politics of the state under a nationwide microscope. 

A Moveable Fest: The acclaimed Netflix series Chef’s Table is launching its inaugural food festival this August in Park City, Utah, although the cost of attendance made me lose my appetite. The most affordable option for the four-day experience starts at $2,000, with other tiers ranging from $4,000 to $15,000. The exorbitant event is the apotheosis of culinary culture, which has helped fuel the rise of related festivals across the country, many of which are the experiential extensions of food media brands. On Wednesday, the spirits media brand The Daily Pour, founded by TV personality Dan Abrams in 2024, acquired the whiskey festival Whiskey Riot, its third such acquisition in 24 months. Food & Wine expanded its flagship event from Aspen to Charleston in 2024, and Complex acquired Family Style with plans to increase its cadence. Eater, The Infatuation, and NYT Cooking all have movable feasts of their own. As the media industry deepens its reliance on events, food media is doing the same.

Podcast Television: The migration of podcasts to streaming platforms continues apace. On Tuesday, SiriusXM announced a partnership with Tubi to bring several of its most popular podcasts, including Conan O’Brien Needs a Friend and What Now? With Trevor Noah, to the free streaming service. Tubi has been a first-mover in this space, signing a similar deal with Audiochuck in October, prompting other streaming platforms including Netflix, Roku, and Paramount to follow suit. Samsung TV Plus has similar plans in the works, I am reliably told. The video transformation of podcasts has proven to be a boon for the industry, as well as for streaming networks, provided consumers flock to the series as executives hope they will. 

Quote/Unquote

Nayeema Raza is a journalist and podcast creator behind the series Smart Girl, Dumb Questions, which was named one of Spotify Wrapped’s Top 10 Best New Shows of 2025 and the Winner of the 2026 iHeart Podcast Award for Best Emerging Show. 

Before launching SGDQ, Raza spent two decades in media, most notably as the longtime on-air executive producer for Sway and On with Kara Swisher, as well as the original cohost of the Semafor podcast Mixed Signals with Ben Smith. Last Thursday, Raza threw a party at 30 Rockefeller to celebrate its first 50 episodes. 

This interview has been edited.

Mark Stenberg: How would you describe what Smart Girl, Dumb Questions is?

Nayeema Raza: It’s a weekly comedic interview show, rooted in journalism with the addition of irreverent comedy and wit. I interview guests like Mark Cuban, Esther Perel, and Diplo, trying to make sense of modern life for a wide swath of millennials and Gen Z.

Mark: Where do most people engage with it?

Nayeema: It’s consumed on Apple, Spotify, and YouTube, in that order. Some people listen, some watch clips, some people watch. What I focus on is making every piece of derivative content a cohesive experience. Having covered media, I think you need to be ubiquitous and do your best to meet people wherever they are.

Mark: You decided to make it a video-first product. Why is that?

Nayeema: I came up as a documentary filmmaker, and I like to start there because it is the most holistic of formats. You can turn video into print, into a clip, into audio, but the reverse is more difficult. I also think video is only becoming more pervasive, such that in the future people will consume podcasts on LinkedIn the way they currently do on TikTok. 

Mark: How do you monetize it? Are you part of an ad network?

Nayeema: Right now it is primarily sponsorship, either through specific episodes or groups of thematically connected episodes, such as my series about personal finance with Chime. I also do events: We did two sold-out tapings at the Comedy Cellar, one of which was a live taping where I asked Neil DeGrasse Tyson what you should do if you meet an alien.  

Mark: A lot of creatives want to hand off revenue development as soon as they can, but you seem keen to be involved with it.

Nayeema: It’s a fully independent podcast, so you have to be in the thick of it. I also enjoy it—I have an MBA from Stanford and want to understand the business of my business. I think it ultimately makes the product better, and we are on pace to surpass $1 million in revenue in our second year.

Pulled Quotes

“You’ve got this situation where the people that are the most passionate about whatever the event is are feeling like they are nothing more than a revenue figure on a bottom-line spreadsheet.”
Ticket News reporter Dave Clark, on the damaging effects of the exorbitant cost of live sporting events
READ MORE

“I think what James wants is cultural relevance amongst the sort of people that wouldn’t speak to him because of his last name.”
An industry insider, on why James Murdoch is acquiring Vox Media
READ MORE

“We all strongly ask again that you change the sour look Bill has on his face at the end shot.”
Gates Ventures executive Ian Saunders, part of the team responsible for managing Bill Gates’ (now sullied) image
READ MORE

“That a movie born from an internet meme opened bigger than the latest Pixar release and sequels to “The Devil Wears Prada” and “Scream” is melting brains in the offices of studio executives …”
WSJ reporters Ben Fritz and John Jurgensen, on how Backrooms is upending Hollywood
READ MORE

Mark Stenberg

Mark Stenberg is ADWEEK's senior media reporter.

The Latest

Newsletters

By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy . You may opt-out anytime by clicking 'unsubscribe' from the newsletter or from your account.

Select ADWEEK as one of your favorite sources and stay up to date on our latest content.